[dns-operations] glitch on [ip6|in-addr].arpa?

[David Conrad]

Adam,

On Oct 10, 2019, at 8:28 AM, Adam Vallee <adam.vallee at gmail.com> wrote:
> In my opinion, a new C root operator should be chosen based on the fact that Cogent is not fulfilling its duty to operate their root servers for the benefit of the internet as a whole.
> 
> It seems to me that they are operating the root for the benefit of their customers only. And the fact that they do block access from HE.net <http://he.net/> over IPv6 should be grounds for their agreement to be torn up,

What agreement?

> the responsibility should be assigned to a group of ISPs.
> 

> And don't get me started on G root, or H root.

I’d recommend reading "A Proposed Governance Model for the DNS Root Server System” (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rssac-037-15jun18-en.pdf)

Regards,
-drc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20191010/956a3f72/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20191010/956a3f72/attachment.sig>