[dns-operations] glitch on [ip6|in-addr].arpa?

Adam Vallee adam.vallee at gmail.com
Thu Oct 10 04:28:49 UTC 2019


In my opinion, a new C root operator should be chosen based on the fact
that Cogent is not fulfilling its duty to operate their root servers for
the benefit of the internet as a whole.

It seems to me that they are operating the root for the benefit of their
customers only. And the fact that they do block access from HE.net over
IPv6 should be grounds for their agreement to be torn up, the
responsibility should be assigned to a group of ISPs.

And don't get me started on G root, or H root.

Adam Vallee

On Wed., Oct. 9, 2019, 11:10 p.m. Matthew Pounsett, <matt at conundrum.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 22:57, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane at dukhovni.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 05:41:43PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>
>> > No, even small responses receive no answers from the IPv6 addresses
>> > of the C and F roots.  Both of the below time out even though I'm
>> > not setting the "DO" bit:
>> >
>> >     $ dig -6 +norecur -t soa arpa. @2001:500:2f::f
>> >     $ dig -6 +norecur -t soa arpa. @2001:500:2::c
>> >
>> > Looks like an outage from my vantage point.
>>
>
> I can't speak to the reachability of F from that vantage point, but Cogent
> has famously refused to peer over v6 with HE, which is why they're
> unreachable from OARC (and therefore DNSViz) and lots of other places on
> the Internet.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20191010/cec4435f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the dns-operations mailing list