[dns-operations] anti-business hippies (Re: the real reason for ICANN's gTLD expansion seems to be...)
phill at hallambaker.com
Wed Jan 3 21:26:10 UTC 2018
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> wrote:
> Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org
>> <mailto:paul at redbarn.org>> wrote:
>> i'm not sure why i would care. whether or not gtld-induced badness
>> is part of a zero sum game is irrelevant. if there is net new
>> badness, i don't like it. if it allowed some badness to move here
>> from elsewhere, i don't like that either.
>> There is one difference. If the badness has moved rather than this
>> being new badness, we can avoid the problem entirely by blocking the new
>> gTLDs entirely.
>> I have yet to hear one good reason for supporting resolution of the new
>> Is ICANN sharing any of the rent they are extracting with me? No.
>> Is there any resource that is not malicious of significance on a gTLD?
>> Not that I am aware.
>> Black hole rout 'em till they give the community a good reason to exist.
> since it's a new year, and since i post this every year, happy new year!
If you were going to go that route, you want to make cryptographic keys
the basis of the Internet identifier scheme for services and hosts and then
make human friendly names a layer above that.
I have an outstanding IAB naming workshop action item to write up some
questions on that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dns-operations