<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Paul Vixie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paul@redbarn.org" target="_blank">paul@redbarn.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">
<br>
<br>
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Paul Vixie <<a href="mailto:paul@redbarn.org" target="_blank">paul@redbarn.org</a><br></span>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:paul@redbarn.org" target="_blank">paul@redbarn.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
</blockquote>
...<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">
i'm not sure why i would care. whether or not gtld-induced badness<br>
is part of a zero sum game is irrelevant. if there is net new<br>
badness, i don't like it. if it allowed some badness to move here<br>
from elsewhere, i don't like that either.<br>
<br>
There is one difference. If the badness has moved rather than this<br>
being new badness, we can avoid the problem entirely by blocking the new<br>
gTLDs entirely.<br>
<br>
I have yet to hear one good reason for supporting resolution of the new<br>
gTLDs.<br>
<br>
Is ICANN sharing any of the rent they are extracting with me? No.<br>
<br>
Is there any resource that is not malicious of significance on a gTLD?<br>
Not that I am aware.<br>
<br>
Black hole rout 'em till they give the community a good reason to exist.<br>
<br></span>
...<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
since it's a new year, and since i post this every year, happy new year!<br>
<br>
<a href="http://family.redbarn.org/~vixie/bad-dns-paper.pdf" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://family.redbarn.org/~vix<wbr>ie/bad-dns-paper.pdf</a></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">If you were going to go that route, you want to make cryptographic keys the basis of the Internet identifier scheme for services and hosts and then make human friendly names a layer above that.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">I have an outstanding IAB naming workshop action item to write up some questions on that.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></div></div><div> </div></div></div></div>