[dns-operations] Alternatives to ldns-verify-zone

Matthew Pounsett matt at conundrum.com
Fri Sep 23 04:56:15 UTC 2016


On 22 September 2016 at 21:05, Paul Wouters <paul at nohats.ca> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>
> There also happen to be 33 bugs currently open against ldns, most of which
>> are still marked as "new" (not yet assigned to anyone to fix).  The
>> earliest of these is from 2012, but most
>> seem to be in the 2014 to 2015 range.  ldns looks abandoned; I don't see
>> any reason anyone looking at the NLNet pages would assume otherwise.
>>
>
> http://git.nlnetlabs.nl/ldns/log/?h=develop
>
> Last commit 3 weeks ago, so I wouldn't call it abandoned. But now that
> unbound and getdns are not using ldns anymore, it has lost some of its
> activity. But adding 5 new RR types is something a lot of people on
> this list could do :P
>

A recent commit doesn't actually mean much to people using it.   If it's
active, someone should be looking at the bug database, and there should
have been a release sometime in the last 2.5 years.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20160923/27327749/attachment.html>


More information about the dns-operations mailing list