[dns-operations] An simple observation
Davey Song
songlinjian at gmail.com
Fri Sep 26 04:34:08 UTC 2014
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
>
> In message <CAAObRXKo5GbesOA-wQ0K=
> iFCMHMgQraXQ9nEUyBnZJFwe5KUJQ at mail.gmail.com>, Davey Song writes:
> > Hi everyone, I‘m recently doing a little survey on the penetration of
> IPv6
> > in DNS system and it's latent problems.
> >
> > I find that top websites like Google, Wikipedia,Yahoo already support
> IPv6
> > access, but its name servers are still IPv4-only. I'm wondering why? is
> > there any operation consideration or risk in their IPv6 deployment?
>
> Registrars making it difficult to add AAAA addresses. Inertia.
> CDN's not supporting IPv6 nameservers.
>
> Yes. they need more incentive to update their system.
Actually, I firstly pay attention to the dual-stack in DNS is the setting
to keep the independence of DNS transport and DNS records(RFC4472). I
think this setting in a way provide a reason for Registrar/Registry/CDN not
doing so.
> Best Regards,
> > Davey
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20140926/12b2ce2c/attachment.html>
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list