[dns-operations] RRL specified in a stable place?

Paul Vixie paul at redbarn.org
Mon Feb 4 19:07:43 UTC 2013

Paul Hoffman wrote:
> We now have two implementation of response rate limiting (RRL). In order for it to be widely adopted, an Internet-Draft followed by an RFC would be Really Helpful.


> If this is not possible due to overcommitment on the parts of the authors, I would be willing to be primary editor of the draft. This work should begin sooner, not after another implementation has started but gone in a different direction.

i have time, and i am willing to upgrade the tech note to an internet
draft and submit it. it's somewhat out of date but the general idea is
present at <http://ss.vix.su/~vixie/isc-tn-2012-1.txt>.


More information about the dns-operations mailing list