[dns-operations] RRL specified in a stable place?

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Mon Feb 4 19:11:43 UTC 2013

On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> wrote:

> Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> We now have two implementation of response rate limiting (RRL). In order for it to be widely adopted, an Internet-Draft followed by an RFC would be Really Helpful.
> agreed.
>> If this is not possible due to overcommitment on the parts of the authors, I would be willing to be primary editor of the draft. This work should begin sooner, not after another implementation has started but gone in a different direction.
> i have time, and i am willing to upgrade the tech note to an internet
> draft and submit it. it's somewhat out of date but the general idea is
> present at <http://ss.vix.su/~vixie/isc-tn-2012-1.txt>.

Having the Internet Draft be up-to-date and reflect both implementations would be great.

This could easily start off as an Experimental RFC.

--Paul Hoffman

More information about the dns-operations mailing list