[dns-operations] There's obviously no "rule" against this...
rick.jones2 at hp.com
Mon Nov 26 19:48:33 UTC 2007
paul at vix.com wrote:
>>but I am seeing more and more of it from hosts that tickle my network.
> 220.127.116.11.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer by1sch4030215.phx.gbl.
> seems like if gethostbyname(gethostbyaddr(getpeername(socket))) does not
> resolve, then we've got no reason to accept the connection. is there an
> apache setting that would cause this? widespread use of same would make
> a de facto "rule" that crawlers would pretty much have to follow.
Shouldn't that be:
More information about the dns-operations