[as112-ops] IPv6 + AS112?

Jonathan Stewart jonathan.stewart at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 18:31:27 UTC 2013


Until the delegations are there to blackhole-3 and blackhole-4, this IPv6
effort will not have any effect, is that correct?

So if I added IPv6 as proposed here, i think i would get 0 queries, as
nothing in the DNS points to the IPv6 addresses of the AS112 node.

Or am I misunderstanding?


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:10 AM, William F. Maton Sotomayor <
wmaton at ottix.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
>
>  But, i note there is no AAAA in existence for blackhole-1.iana.org,
>> blackhole-2, or prisoner.
>>
>
> Corect, no IPv6 record yet.  But see:
>
>         https://www.as112.net/ipv6-**trials.html<https://www.as112.net/ipv6-trials.html>
>
> A few operators are trying this out, but really this needs something a
> little more official from IANA.  There are also some draft RFCs attempting
> to make the rounds at the IETF regarding further allocations, plus one
> seeking to delegate it all.  But it runs specially hacked code.
>
> Someone else made a proposal last year and even more recently to use DNAME.
>
> wfms
>



-- 
     Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/as112-ops/attachments/20130625/4f7bd211/attachment.htm>


More information about the as112-ops mailing list