<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Until the delegations are there to blackhole-3 and blackhole-4, this IPv6 effort will not have any effect, is that correct?<br><br></div>So if I added IPv6 as proposed here, i think i would get 0 queries, as nothing in the DNS points to the IPv6 addresses of the AS112 node.<br>
<br></div>Or am I misunderstanding?<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:10 AM, William F. Maton Sotomayor <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wmaton@ottix.net" target="_blank">wmaton@ottix.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Jonathan Stewart wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
But, i note there is no AAAA in existence for <a href="http://blackhole-1.iana.org" target="_blank">blackhole-1.iana.org</a>,<br>
blackhole-2, or prisoner.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Corect, no IPv6 record yet. But see:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.as112.net/ipv6-trials.html" target="_blank">https://www.as112.net/ipv6-<u></u>trials.html</a><br>
<br>
A few operators are trying this out, but really this needs something a little more official from IANA. There are also some draft RFCs attempting to make the rounds at the IETF regarding further allocations, plus one seeking to delegate it all. But it runs specially hacked code.<br>
<br>
Someone else made a proposal last year and even more recently to use DNAME.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
wfms<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br> Jonathan
</div>