[as112-ops] Section 4.4 of RFC 4193 and AS112

[William F. Maton Sotomayor]

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Paul Vixie wrote:

>> We might have to wait until the Chicago meeting to get traction on this,
>> but my feeling is that there is support for it.
>
> i can think of at least one person on dnsop@ who will scream bloody murder
> ("why this set of operators? who controls the IRR for that netblock?" etc).
> a number of other folks will likely say, "why is this like the rootops where
> IANA has no contracts with the operators?" and "should there be an MoU?"

If that's the case, perhaps we should go direct to IANA for the 
delegations, seeing if their response is to follow a process established 
through the IETF?

wfms