[as112-ops] Section 4.4 of RFC 4193 and AS112

[Paul Vixie]

> SRA and Peter Koch asked the room for a hum in Prague to find out whether
> there was consensus for adding IPv6 transport and sensible ip6.arpa zones
> into the mix, and the hum said yes. When I asked what that meant
> procedurally, I was told by the two chairs that a working group document
> which made requests of the IANA and which updated the as112-ops draft to
> include the v6 aspects would probably be the best way.
> 
> We might have to wait until the Chicago meeting to get traction on this,
> but my feeling is that there is support for it.

i can think of at least one person on dnsop@ who will scream bloody murder
("why this set of operators? who controls the IRR for that netblock?" etc).
a number of other folks will likely say, "why is this like the rootops where
IANA has no contracts with the operators?" and "should there be an MoU?"

so, support i know there is, but traction i cannot confidently predict.