[as112-ops] Section 4.4 of RFC 4193 and AS112

[Joe Abley]

On 4-Jun-2007, at 16:14, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:

> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>>> We might have to wait until the Chicago meeting to get traction  
>>> on this,
>>> but my feeling is that there is support for it.
>>
>> i can think of at least one person on dnsop@ who will scream  
>> bloody murder
>> ("why this set of operators? who controls the IRR for that  
>> netblock?" etc).
>> a number of other folks will likely say, "why is this like the  
>> rootops where
>> IANA has no contracts with the operators?" and "should there be an  
>> MoU?"
>
> If that's the case, perhaps we should go direct to IANA for the
> delegations, seeing if their response is to follow a process  
> established
> through the IETF?

I am enthusiastic about the idea of waiting for the IETF process  
approach to fail before trying alternatives, rather than simply  
assuming it will fail and not even trying :-)


Joe