[as112-ops] Section 4.4 of RFC 4193 and AS112

[Joe Abley]

On 4-Jun-2007, at 14:13, Paul Vixie wrote:

>>> Can you make that approach on the AS112 operator's behalf?
>>
>> The other avenue (which was discussed at the dnsop meeting in  
>> Prague) is for
>> the IETF to instruct the IANA to perform the delegation. This seems a
>> preferable approach to me, since it leaves a paper trail, and the
>> interaction with the IANA would then take place within a  
>> recognised channel.
>
> i agree, but, i don't know how to do that.  ideally we could ask  
> ietf to do
> this retroactively, to cover the current AS112 delegations.  if we  
> knew how.

We have two active documents which have been adopted by dnsop which  
concern as112, and part of the motivation for adopting them was so  
that the various registry aspects of the AS112 service could be  
documented (the current AS112 delegations are covered in draft-dnsop- 
as112-ops).

SRA and Peter Koch asked the room for a hum in Prague to find out  
whether there was consensus for adding IPv6 transport and sensible  
ip6.arpa zones into the mix, and the hum said yes. When I asked what  
that meant procedurally, I was told by the two chairs that a working  
group document which made requests of the IANA and which updated the  
as112-ops draft to include the v6 aspects would probably be the best  
way.

We might have to wait until the Chicago meeting to get traction on  
this, but my feeling is that there is support for it.


Joe