[dns-operations] Survey on DNS resolver operations and DNSSEC

Bill Woodcock woody at pch.net
Mon Mar 21 12:19:24 UTC 2022


You have an implicit bias problem in your survey:


The previous question was _whether_ this was the case, and included “strongly disagree.”  Here, you assume non-negative values.

The alternative to DNSSEC validation is man-in-the-middle compromises.  We wouldn’t be doing DNSSEC validation if it caused more workload than man-in-the-middle compromises.  Therefore the increased workload is negative, not positive.

                                -Bill

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20220321/0558a081/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-12.png
Type: image/png
Size: 117978 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20220321/0558a081/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20220321/0558a081/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the dns-operations mailing list