[dns-operations] Any DNAME usage experience?

[John Levine]

In article <22698cb2-ef91-f783-bc53-6f028cc6a45f at nic.cz> you write:
>On 30. 03. 20 12:35, Meir Kraushar via dns-operations wrote:
>> - Obviously resolver compliance is very important (Knot support is questionable?)
>
>We intend to release fix in 5.1.0 release, probably next week:
>https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/-/merge_requests/965
>
>I'm sorry for being late to the DNAME party.

It's only been 20 years.  The party's hardly gotten started.

R's,
John