[dns-operations] Any DNAME usage experience?
johnl at taugh.com
Tue Mar 31 20:42:55 UTC 2020
In article <22698cb2-ef91-f783-bc53-6f028cc6a45f at nic.cz> you write:
>On 30. 03. 20 12:35, Meir Kraushar via dns-operations wrote:
>> - Obviously resolver compliance is very important (Knot support is questionable?)
>We intend to release fix in 5.1.0 release, probably next week:
>I'm sorry for being late to the DNAME party.
It's only been 20 years. The party's hardly gotten started.
More information about the dns-operations