[dns-operations] Nameserver responses from different IP than destination of request
Robert Edmonds
edmonds at mycre.ws
Sat Aug 29 04:18:04 UTC 2020
Puneet Sood via dns-operations wrote:
> RFC 1035 section 7.3 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1035)
> Some name servers send their responses from different
> addresses than the one used to receive the query. That is, a
> resolver cannot rely that a response will come from the same
> address which it sent the corresponding query to. This name
> server bug is typically encountered in UNIX systems.
>
> RFC 2181 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2181#section-4)
> Most, if not all, DNS clients, expect the address from which a reply
> is received to be the same address as that to which the query
> eliciting the reply was sent. This is true for servers acting as
> clients for the purposes of recursive query resolution, as well as
> simple resolver clients. The address, along with the identifier (ID)
> in the reply is used for disambiguating replies, and filtering
> spurious responses. This may, or may not, have been intended when
> the DNS was designed, but is now a fact of life.
>
> Some multi-homed hosts running DNS servers generate a reply using a
> source address that is not the same as the destination address from
> the client's request packet. Such replies will be discarded by the
> client because the source address of the reply does not match that of
> a host to which the client sent the original request. That is, it
> appears to be an unsolicited response.
See also RFC 5452 section 9.1
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5452#section-9.1) which puts the
clarification in RFC 2181 into mandatory RFC 2119 language.
9.1. Query Matching Rules
A resolver implementation MUST match responses to all of the
following attributes of the query:
o Source address against query destination address
o Destination address against query source address
o Destination port against query source port
o Query ID
o Query name
o Query class and type
before applying DNS trustworthiness rules (see Section 5.4.1 of
[RFC2181]).
A mismatch and the response MUST be considered invalid.
--
Robert Edmonds
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list