[dns-operations] TLD(s) for private use
Tony Finch
dot at dotat.at
Thu Sep 7 15:42:42 UTC 2017
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote:
>
> I disagree, having random numbers is the right way (it prevents
> collisions). See RFC 4193.
And RFC 1918 section 5 para 7:
If two (or more) organizations follow the address allocation
specified in this document and then later wish to establish IP
connectivity with each other, then there is a risk that address
uniqueness would be violated. To minimize the risk it is strongly
recommended that an organization using private IP addresses choose
randomly from the reserved pool of private addresses, when allocating
sub-blocks for its internal allocation.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode
Biscay: Westerly 3 or 4, increasing 5 or 6, occasionally 7 later in north.
Moderate, occasionally rough later in north. Rain later. Good, occasionally
moderate later.
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list