[dns-operations] 192.0.32.10 is for example.com

[Florian Weimer]

* Paul Vixie:

> David Conrad wrote:
>> Sorry for being dense, but can you explain the damage being caused by
>> the use of that address?
>
> it's the wrong thing to do. do i have to prove damage to get a reaction?

There's real damage from rogue DNS servers which claim to be
authoritative for other people's zones, but that's standard industry
practice.

In the end, there are only some many issues we can actively deal with.