[dns-operations] 192.0.32.10 is for example.com

Tue Oct 4 12:09:33 UTC 2016

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:50:36 +0000
Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> wrote:

> it's the wrong thing to do. do i have to prove damage to get a reaction?

Is this in part a passive DNS problem?  I imagine if someone were using
192.0.2.1, addresses reserved for private use or documentation
purposes, or other unused address space that could be easily filtered
out as unassigned to any specific organization this wouldn't bother you?

John