[dns-operations] Robert Graham - A Quick Review of the BIND9 Code.

[Marek Vavruša]

On 30 July 2015 at 19:35, Jonathan Stewart <jonathan.stewart at gmail.com> wrote:
> "The control-plane should be on a separate network adapter, separate network
> address, and separate port numbers. These should be hidden from the public,
> and protected by a firewall."
>
> Software bugs should be addressed with additional hardware adapters,
> separate network segments, and firewalls?  For a publicly available service?
>
> Roland, why did you post this?

I read "daemon remote control should be separated from the query
processing, and possibly listen on a different interface".
What's wrong with that?

> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 31 Jul 2015, at 0:06, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>
>> > I had to stop reading there.
>>
>> Yes - that part made no sense whatsoever.

It makes sense in a way that if you're not aiming for raw performance,
then you're better of with memory-safe languages.
That is an opinionated, but somewhat reasonable suggestion.

>> -----------------------------------
>> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dns-operations mailing list
>> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
>> dns-jobs mailing list
>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
>
>
>
>
> --
>      Jonathan
>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-jobs mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs