[dns-operations] Storm on the DNS

Song Linjian (Davey) songlinjian at gmail.com
Thu Dec 17 03:53:43 UTC 2015

> 在 2015年12月16日,19:21,Paul Vixie <vixie at tisf.net> 写道:
> as to 3.3, i think this is wrong. the two-octet length field is a tcp/53 transport artifact and should not be copied into the payload transmitted by http-over-dns proxy systems.

Sure, it is wrong to copy the two-octet into the wire-format data carried by HTTP head. I may introduce some confusion here. 

What I mentioned in the draft is a caution to aware the two octets in DNS/TCP/53. HTTP already has a content-length header filed to serve the same purpose .

> -- 
> P. Vixie
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net <mailto:dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net>
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations>
> dns-jobs mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs>
Davey Song(宋林健)
songlinjian at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20151217/6e67fbb1/attachment.html>

More information about the dns-operations mailing list