[dns-operations] All NSs for a TLD being in the TLD itself
wolfgang.nagele at ausregistry.com.au
Thu Oct 24 22:53:03 UTC 2013
Why would this be unsafe and/or fragile? As was already mentioned the root zone has to include glue for whichever name you choose anyway, due to the position in the hierarchy - so it's just a matter of reducing unnecessary dependencies for us. Happy to hear thoughts besides the "religious" believes. :)
ARI Registry Services
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
Phone +61 3 9866 3710
Email: wolfgang.nagele at ariservices.com
The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.
On 10/25/13 1:54 AM, "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org<mailto:paul.hoffman at vpnc.org>> wrote:
The new records for one of the shiny new gTLDs are:
xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN NS a.nic.xn--ngbc5azd.
xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN NS b.nic.xn--ngbc5azd.
xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN NS c.nic.xn--ngbc5azd.
xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN NS d.nic.xn--ngbc5azd.
a.nic.xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN A 22.214.171.124
a.nic.xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN AAAA 2001:dcd:1:0:0:0:0:3
b.nic.xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN A 126.96.36.199
b.nic.xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN AAAA 2001:dcd:2:0:0:0:0:3
c.nic.xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN A 188.8.131.52
c.nic.xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN AAAA 2001:dcd:3:0:0:0:0:3
d.nic.xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN A 184.108.40.206
d.nic.xn--ngbc5azd. 172800 IN AAAA 2001:dcd:4:0:0:0:0:3
This works, of course, but it feels a bit fragile for me. Is there a history of this being unsafe? Of being more safe than NSs whose names are in other TLDs?
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net<mailto:dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net>
dns-jobs mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dns-operations