[dns-operations] RRL specified in a stable place?
paul at redbarn.org
Mon Feb 4 22:43:36 UTC 2013
Edward Lewis wrote:
> Why an /IETF/ document? In what way does Response Rate Limiting
> impact interoperability of implementations?
> If this is not an independent submission, how does it fit into a
> working group? The implementations are pretty much out there, what's
> to work on?
> I understand that would be useful is a reference-able document
> describing the RRL. That is, something stable and reviewed - and that
> could be an RFC. But an RFC does not have to come through the IETF.
gentlemen, this is gangster on gangster violence. please figure out
which i to dot and which t to cross, and let me know. i promise on my
honour to do my best to appease the internet standards gods in their
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dns-operations