[dns-operations] Implementation of negative trust anchors?
woolf at isc.org
Mon Aug 26 11:52:39 UTC 2013
On Aug 23, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> wrote:
> on the other hand i would not be glad to see NTA as an IETF RFC, FYI, BCP, or other standards-like artifact.
The current draft proposed status is "Informational."
That is, not standards-track and not BCP.
It has cautionary language in it regarding the limited applicability of NTAs and IME the authors are not opposed to strengthening that.
"Should we document it as an RFC anyway?" is a reasonable question, and I tend to think so but (like others I know here) I can live with either outcome.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dns-operations