[dns-operations] Implementation of negative trust anchors?
each at isc.org
Fri Aug 23 17:28:45 UTC 2013
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:03:25AM -0700, Paul Vixie wrote:
> on the other hand i would not be glad to see NTA as an IETF RFC, FYI,
> BCP, or other standards-like artifact.
A document that advised limits on the use of NTAs -- for example, the
recommendation in Jason's draft that they not persist for more than
a day -- would be okay by me.
Evan Hunt -- each at isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
More information about the dns-operations