[dns-operations] thoughts on DNSSEC

Paul Vixie paul at redbarn.org
Thu Jul 19 16:57:54 UTC 2012

On 7/19/2012 4:55 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 7:25 AM, WBrown at e1b.org wrote:
>> And in order to pass OT&E testing, NetSol's client application must pass 
>> muster.  So they must be able to handle DNSSEC.  Maybe I should give up 
>> tilting at this windmill and live with DLV for now.  
> IMHO, I think this sends the wrong message.  One of the highest bandwidth signals a for profit companies can receive is money walking away. Enough money walks away and priorities will get shifted. Using DLV and staying with NetSol merely reaffirms their de-prioritization of DNSSEC. 

i agree. the better answer is to reward with your business those
registrars who adopt the technologies you need.


More information about the dns-operations mailing list