[dns-operations] Who Ignores TTLs ?
warren at kumari.net
Thu Feb 17 15:59:24 UTC 2011
On Feb 16, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Simon Lyall wrote:
> I keep seeing a persistent complaint that some DNS caching operators
> ignore TTLs or otherwise keep records for longer than the TTL would
> I suspect this might be an urban legend since most DNS caching
> software doesn't even offer this as an option last time I checked.
I suspect that the genesis of this belief is from an Online provider
They used to ignore all TTLs and overwrite them with (AFAIR), 6 hours,
but stopped this practice sometime before 2005 -- unfortunately it has
become ingrained wisdom that is hard to shift.
The other part of the story is applications that call gethostbyname()
(or equivalent) at startup / initial connection and keep the result
until they die. This used to be even more common, but now that
(apparently) all the world is a webbrowser this isn't as common....
> Does anybody actually do this? Because it keep being brought up by
> some peopel as to why things like GSLB don't work.
> Simon Lyall | Very Busy | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/
> "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT.
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
I once absend-mindedly ordered Three Mile Island dressing in a
restaurant and, with great presence of mind, they brought Thousand
Island Dressing and a bottle of chili sauce.
-- Terry Pratchett
More information about the dns-operations