[dns-operations] Who Ignores TTLs ?
bert.hubert at netherlabs.nl
Thu Feb 17 06:38:37 UTC 2011
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 03:01:17PM +1300, Simon Lyall wrote:
> I keep seeing a persistent complaint that some DNS caching operators
> ignore TTLs or otherwise keep records for longer than the TTL would
I am aware of a severely resource constrained PowerDNS operator once
patching their Recursor to set a lower bound on their TTLs of 5 or 10
But this is probably not on the scale of what you mean.
More information about the dns-operations