[dns-operations] Missing .us and GTLD records??

[Michael Graff]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2010-05-19 12:42 AM, Michael Sinatra wrote:

> Moreover, "adopting IPv6" does not necessarily require "abating IPv4" at
> the same time.

Indeed.

One big difference though is that in the not to distant future, the
price of an IPv4 address may increase dramatically.  That is what
happens when a resource runs out.  We may start finding that the cost of
not using IPv6 will be higher than the cost of deploying it.

I also think people are seeing that it isn't going to be a pure world
for quite some time; IPv4 can't just be switched off, indeed may never
be so.  However, for some, the reality of a IPv6 only service is
suddenly becoming more likely.

- --Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvzfxoACgkQ+NNi0s9NRJ0OPgCfVE3JBis49BnooSc9wJEs7+9R
dd4AoIt1zLDx6dlGZ88JGKvtpBBTWxaS
=md1h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----