[dns-operations] BIND version and NSEC3

[Michael Monnerie]

On Freitag 15 Mai 2009 Michael Sinatra wrote:
> Setting aside the DLV, if the dns-operations list is getting too
> DNSSEC-y for folks then we can consider a dnssec-operations list.
> Personally, I am as concerned about the proliferation of similar
> mailing lists as I am about the dilution of existing ones.

+1

I believe a lot of people (like me) are mostly listening here, in order 
to get a feeling what's up with DNS. The recent DNSSEC and DLV problems 
even led to an ISP meeting here in Austria, where things were discussed. 
If you create another dnssec list, most people will also (have to) 
subscribe there to see what's going on.

After all, everybody with a mail client capable of sorting threads 
together can simply "mark group as read". As long as there are no flames 
but intelligent (well, ehrm, ok) discussions I'd like to read it.

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20090516/44735241/attachment.sig>