[dns-operations] .MUC ?

[Eric Brunner-Williams]

Well, since you ask ...

Yes.

This assumes the present mid-point between v2 and v3 of the GFA is 
understood, by me at least, and of course, IANAL. YMMV. VWPBL.

There are of course a wonderful number of nuances that rely upon (a) 
claims of right based upon some extension of iso3166-1 (alpha2 values) 
to iso3166-2 (alpha3) values, (b) similarity to existing alpha3 (or 
longer!) labels already present in the IANA root, (c) claims of right 
based up some theory of prior right by SITA and/or IATA, (d) claims of 
right based up some theory of prior right through (i) trademark or (ii) 
servicemark or (iii) prior use, and (e) novel claims under the "security 
and stability" rubric.

My vote for BMW's .MUC is "must use carbon".

Eric

Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>        Leaking intranet pages:
>>
>> https://gis.bmw.com/gis/e/faq.htm
>>     
>
> Just a guess, perhaps bmw is using an airport code pseudo-tld for
> different pieces of their intranet.
>
> Now that brings to mind, will icann permit using airport codes for the
> new gTLDs ?
>
> Cheers
> Jorge
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
>
>
>