[dns-operations] .MUC ?

[Jorge Amodio]

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:15 PM, David Conrad<drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
>> Now that brings to mind, will icann permit using airport codes for the
>> new gTLDs ?
>
> You mean like:
>
> CAT: New Bight, Bahamas
> GOV: Nhulunbuy, Australia
> MIL: Milan, Italy
> ORG: Paramaribo, Suriname

Obviously there are conflicts there, but .muc (Munich), .mia (Miami),
.jfk (NYC),
do not represent a conflict with existing TLDs and I'm lost now on all verborage
if IATA codes where included in the criteria for the evaluation of geographic
names.

BTW, SITA has already several IATA codes active under .aero (www.jfk.aero,
www.mia.aero, etc).

Didn't somebody brought the point up in the past that Cisco or somebody else
is using .LAN internally ? ( LAN in iata is Lansing, MI )