[dns-operations] Delegation checking
jrhett at netconsonance.com
Fri Jan 18 19:26:20 UTC 2008
On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jo Rhett:
>> From the rest of your post, I think you do. Let me rephrase: we
>> should make the registrant suffer by breaking their web and email
>> rather than making us suffer.
> Who is "us"? Registrars? Registries?
> For completely lame delegations that aren't just temporary, it's
> probably a good idea to pull the NS records from the parent zone (with
> proper safeguards, of course). But in this case, I fail to see how
> anyone suffers, how there's an improvement, and how this could prompt
> any action from the registrant.
> If just one of the listed servers is lame, I don't think you can
> justify a suspension of that delegation. It doesn't make much sense
> from a technical perspective. It's also quite hard to prove that a
> delegation is really lame for large parts of the net.
Sorry, I had moved on to invalid contact information. If the contact
information for the zone is invalid...
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
More information about the dns-operations