[dns-operations] Delegation checking
fweimer at bfk.de
Fri Jan 18 19:16:12 UTC 2008
* Jo Rhett:
> From the rest of your post, I think you do. Let me rephrase: we
> should make the registrant suffer by breaking their web and email
> rather than making us suffer.
Who is "us"? Registrars? Registries?
For completely lame delegations that aren't just temporary, it's
probably a good idea to pull the NS records from the parent zone (with
proper safeguards, of course). But in this case, I fail to see how
anyone suffers, how there's an improvement, and how this could prompt
any action from the registrant.
If just one of the listed servers is lame, I don't think you can
justify a suspension of that delegation. It doesn't make much sense
from a technical perspective. It's also quite hard to prove that a
delegation is really lame for large parts of the net.
Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
More information about the dns-operations