[dns-operations] Some DNSSEC trivia
Andrew Sullivan
andrew at ca.afilias.info
Wed Jan 9 15:47:16 UTC 2008
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:30:48AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> The registry *already* have this requirement. None of them
> became a registry before RFC 1034 was published. They have
> already bought into the requirement whether they realise
> it or not.
You seem to be missing my point, which is that not everyone agrees
with you that this is in fact a requirement; and that we have a
mechanism for deciding whether it _is_ a requirement for a large
number of registries. That mechanism is the consensus process in
ICANN. If you don't like the results of that consensus determination,
then I encourage you either to work within ICANN to change the
determination, or else work to replace ICANN. But saying over and
over again that there's a requirement, when others do not agree there
is one, is not proving anything.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew at ca.afilias.info> M2P 2A8
jabber: ajsaf at jabber.org +1 416 646 3304 x4110
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list