On 25 Sep 2007, at 23:22, Michael Monnerie wrote: > 152.146.4.12.in-addr.arpa. 83000 IN CNAME > 152.128/26.146.4.12.in-addr.arpa. > Could that ever be a valid entry? I believe no, but what could they > have > wanted to do with that form of CNAME? http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2317.html jm -- Times flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like bananas.