[dns-operations] (from nanog) re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?

[Paul Vixie]

here are the ten best messages on a very interesting nanog thread today:

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: mpalmer at hezmatt.org (Matthew Palmer)
Subject: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:40:04 +1000
Size: 4904
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060918/b3ab609e/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: pete at he.iki.fi (Petri Helenius)
Subject: Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:10:02 +0300
Size: 4664
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060918/b3ab609e/attachment-0001.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: ge at linuxbox.org (Gadi Evron)
Subject: Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:18:07 -0500 (CDT)
Size: 4923
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060918/b3ab609e/attachment-0002.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: jim at reptiles.org (Jim Mercer)
Subject: Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:33:06 -0400
Size: 5088
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060918/b3ab609e/attachment-0003.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: ge at linuxbox.org (Gadi Evron)
Subject: Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:16:20 -0500 (CDT)
Size: 5634
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060918/b3ab609e/attachment-0004.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: simonw at zynet.net (Simon Waters)
Subject: Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:28:36 +0100
Size: 5789
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060918/b3ab609e/attachment-0005.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: jmaimon at ttec.com (Joe Maimon)
Subject: Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:32:38 -0400
Size: 6402
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060918/b3ab609e/attachment-0006.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: dts at senie.com (Daniel Senie)
Subject: Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:36:44 -0400
Size: 6072
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060918/b3ab609e/attachment-0007.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: fred at cisco.com (Fred Baker)
Subject: Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:04:55 -0700
Size: 6631
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060918/b3ab609e/attachment-0008.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: peterc at luddite.com.au ("Peter J. Cherny")
Subject: Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:34:33 +1000
Size: 4884
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060918/b3ab609e/attachment-0009.mht>