[as112-ops] [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112-03.txt (fwd)

[William F. Maton Sotomayor]

FYI everyone.

Note that the discussions on DNAME would be interesting to pursue further 
as well.

wfms

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:25:25 -0400
From: Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net>
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop at ietf.org>
Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for
     draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112-03.txt

Hi there all,

We have incorporated consensus from the Orlando meeting (and ML discussions). We have also fleshed this out with e batter overview section, an explanation of why DNSSEC doesn't happen with AS112, etc.

We have requested that the DNSOP chairs adopt this version.

Things that requite more discussions:
1: Is DNAME a viable alternative?
There are pros and cons here -- a better understanding of DNAME support, it may be simpler to just delegate to AS112, etc.
2: Metazones - having a generic DNS sinkhole may be useful for all sorts of things.
3:  Delegating things other than PTR -- we have discussed this in person and it is mentioned in the draft, but perhaps we need more text on using Omniscient AS112 for blackholing things like .belkin / malware..

W


Begin forwarded message:

> From: internet-drafts at ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112-03.txt
> Date: June 20, 2013 8:01:18 PM EDT
> To: William F. Maton Sotomayor <wfms at ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>, Ray Bellis <ray.bellis at nominet.org.uk>, William F. M Sotomayor <wfms at ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>, Joe Abley <joe.abley at icann.org>, Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112-03.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Warren Kumari and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Filename:	 draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112
> Revision:	 03
> Title:		 Omniscient AS112 Servers
> Creation date:	 2013-06-21
> Group:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 14
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112-03.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112-03
> Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112-03
>
> Abstract:
>   The AS112 Project loosely coordinates Domain Name System (DNS)
>   servers to which DNS zones corresponding to private use addresses are
>   delegated.  Queries for names within those zones have no useful
>   responses in a global context.  The purpose of this project is to
>   reduce the load of such junk queries on the authoritative name
>   servers that would otherwise receive them, and instead direct the
>   load to name servers operated within the AS112 project.
>
>   Due to the loosely-coordinated nature of the project, adding and
>   dropping zones from the AS112 servers is difficult.  This document
>   proposes a mechanism by which AS112 name servers could answer
>   authoritatively for all possible zones.  This eliminates the add/drop
>   problem, changing it to a matter of delegation within the DNS and
>   requiring no operational changes on the servers themselves.
>
>   This document updates RFC 6304.
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>

--
It's a mistake trying to cheer up camels. You might as well drop meringues into a black hole. -- Terry Prachett


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop