[as112-ops] Guidance requested before bringing up new AS112 server

[Erwin Botas]

Dear Group,

I installed one server for AS112 here in our datacenter and willing to provide access to other providers here in Costa Rica too, I sent a email to 112 -at- root-servers.org to notify about this and didn't had any response and we were not listed either on the page.

We just need a little help with the IPv6 side as we have full dual stack connectivity on our network. 

What I have to do?

Best Regards to everyone.

Erwin Botas

On Feb 14, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Joe Abley <jabley at hopcount.ca> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jeremy,
>> 
>> On 2013-02-13, at 18:05, "Jeremy L. Gaddis" <jeremy at as54225.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> First off, I work for a fairly small ISP and already provide the "AS112
>>> service" to our own customers, keeping that DNS traffic localized within
>>> our network.
>> 
>> Nice work!
>> 
>>> I am interested in making this service available to the larger Internet
>>> community. My first question is if I need to obtain permission from or
>>> coordinate with anyone before I begin.
>> 
>> Nope. This is the "loosely-coordinated" part of the project. By mentioning here that you're doing something, you've already done more to that end than many people who run up AS112 servers.
>> 
> 
> You don't need to get any permission, you don't need to coordinate. Mentioning it here is useful, mainly for community, so folk know you exist and can help if you have any questions, etc… 
> 
> The page at http://public.as112.net/node/10 says: 
> "This list will usually be updated once every month, unless an email is sent
> to 112 -at- root-servers.org to notify us of a new node. "
> 
> Doesn't hurt to send mail there mentioning that you are doing this (although I think the relevant folk have just read it here too :-P)
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>> I've already had 192.175.48.0/24
>>> added to our upstream's filters so I'm not sure if there's anything I
>>> need to do, procedurely, before "flipping the switch".
>>> 
>>> While I have plenty of bandwidth to spare, I obviously won't know how
>>> much we "need" until our server is in use by the public. For that
>>> reason, my instinct was to simply bring it online, monitor resource
>>> usage for a while, and then make a determination regarding whether this
>>> is something we can continue to offer. If so, great; if not, well, I'll
>>> stop advertising the network.
>> 
>> Sounds entirely sensible.
> 
> Yup!.
> W
> 
>> 
>>> Is there something wrong with my line of thought? Other things I need to
>>> consider (or do) that I haven't already thought of?
>> 
>> Your thinking is perfect.
>> 
>> 
>> Joe
>> _______________________________________________
>> as112-ops mailing list
>> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops
>> 
> 
> -- 
> American Non-Sequitur Society; 
> we don't make sense, but we do like pizza!
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> as112-ops mailing list
> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops