[as112-ops] I-D Action: draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112-00.txt (fwd)

[Aleksi Suhonen]

Hi,

On 05/30/12 23:53, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> 2) The "Omnisicient AS112 Servers" seem more likely than any random
> IP to attract other junk traffic for domains that people don't want
> to get traffic for anymore (disused RBL lists, domains under DoS
> attacks, etc).  Is that a consideration/concern?  I didn't see it
> mentioned in the draft (maybe to not bring attention to it, maybe
> because it's a insignificant concern).

Yeah, I don't think this is a significant concern either. The whole 
point of AS112 servers is to handle junk traffic. I don't think it 
matters who the junk traffic used to belong to. If some node can't 
handle a little extra junk traffic then they probably shouldn't be 
running an AS112 node in any case?

-- 
	+358 4567 02048 / http://www.trex.fi/
	Aleksi Suhonen / TREX  Tampere Region Exchange Oy

     `What I need,' shouted Ford, by way of clarifying his
     previous remarks, `is a strong drink and a peer-group.'
        -- Douglas Adams, Life the Universe and Everything