<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">Good point Bill.<div class="">For consistency, it is a bit too late to change the survey, but we will take this implicit bias into account during evaluation.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">—</div><div class="">Moritz</div><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On 21 Mar 2022, at 13:19, Bill Woodcock <<a href="mailto:woody@pch.net" class="">woody@pch.net</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">You have an implicit bias problem in your survey:<br class=""><br class=""><img apple-inline="yes" id="423E408C-D669-41B3-BF94-A669DD9D1B87" class="" width="630" height="357" src="cid:A3B16C15-DA2C-4AF5-81A4-7FC2400A6E3B"><br class="">The previous question was _whether_ this was the case, and included “strongly disagree.” Here, you assume non-negative values.<br class=""><br class="">The alternative to DNSSEC validation is man-in-the-middle compromises. We wouldn’t be doing DNSSEC validation if it caused more workload than man-in-the-middle compromises. Therefore the increased workload is negative, not positive.<br class=""><br class=""> -Bill<br class=""><br class=""></blockquote><br class=""></div></body></html>