<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">On Thursday, 30 April 2020 07:17:48 UTC Viktor Dukhovni wrote:</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">> I recall seeing a discussion (perhaps a few years back) of balancing</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">> CPU-cost vs. space gained in DNS name compression. Where IIRC it</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">> was suggested that most of the gain may come from only storing and</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">> checking the offsets of particular elements of the response, perhaps</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">> just the qname and the owner of the current RRset, or was it owners</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">> of all previous RRsets? Or something like that, and that this saved</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">> CPU with compression effectiveness not suffering much.</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">> </p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">> Does anyone have a pointer to discussion of this topic?</p>
<p> <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">i didn't see it here, but i did see it on twitter and later at dns-oarc.</p>
<p> <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/29/contributions/658/attachments/641/1039/Welcome_to_DNS-final.pdf</p>
<p> <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">-- </p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;">Paul</p>
</body>
</html>