<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/03/2019 05:36, Paul Vixie wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:83a02a1e-5fe5-e72a-e4e9-2a168c4662de@redbarn.org">yeah,
don't use query logging, use dnstap.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>Well... the original message seems to have been machine
translated into English, but what I understand that Champion Xie
is trying to say is that for some strange reason, he is getting
better performance with logging <i>enabled</i> than with logging
disabled and he's asking why.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:83a02a1e-5fe5-e72a-e4e9-2a168c4662de@redbarn.org">
<br>
Champion Xie wrote on 2019-03-15 01:05:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hi guys:
<br>
<br>
There is the case that I think is strange
<br>
<br>
When I use BIND to configure the authoritative server, when I
query some TCP request to the authoritative server, I find
that the performance under the written log is greater than the
parsing performance under the log off .
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Best Regards!!
<br>
champion_xie
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Mariano Absatz</pre>
</body>
</html>