<html><head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head><body style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255,
255);" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><br>
<br>
Edward Lewis wrote:
<blockquote style="word-wrap: break-word;"
cite="mid:348E10CE-24F2-4703-B49D-B354F1C0FB53@neustar.biz" type="cite"><div>Why
an <i>IETF</i> document? In what way does Response Rate
Limiting impact interoperability of implementations?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>If this is not an independent submission, how does it fit into a
working group? The implementations are pretty much out there, what's to
work on?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I understand that would be useful is a reference-able document
describing the RRL. That is, something stable and reviewed - and that
could be an RFC. But an RFC does not have to come through the IETF.</div></blockquote>
<br>
gentlemen, this is gangster on gangster violence. please figure out
which i to dot and which t to cross, and let me know. i promise on my
honour to do my best to appease the internet standards gods in their
current invocation.<br>
<br>
</body></html>