<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.292969); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">On 9 Oct 2012, at 17:29, Alexander Gurvitz <<a href="mailto:alex@net-me.net">alex@net-me.net</a>> wrote:</span><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr">I came up with a side-by-side comparison of the Verisign patent application vs. the IETF draft which Tony Finch mentioned.<div>It seems that the patent is very close to the draft, with one little change, but as far as I see,</div>
<div>consequence of that little change is that the process described in the patent breaks a DNSSEC validation. :)</div><div><br></div><div>PDF with the comparison - <a href="http://ubuntuone.com/4Bz1BqOsGMkTUQgViEL0rz">http://ubuntuone.com/4Bz1BqOsGMkTUQgViEL0rz</a></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Very nice analysis, and a rather amusing result :-)</div><div><br></div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); "><div>Tony.</div>--<div>f.anthony.n.finch <<a href="mailto:dot@dotat.at">dot@dotat.at</a>> <a href="http://dotat.at/">http://dotat.at/</a></div></span></body></html>