<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><div style="-webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.234375); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.234375);"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.285156); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.214844); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.214844);">Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos. </span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.277344); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.210938); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.210938);"><br></span></div></div><div>On Jun 10, 2012, at 5:36, "Dobbins, Roland" <<a href="mailto:rdobbins@arbor.net">rdobbins@arbor.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span></span><span>On Jun 10, 2012, at 6:25 PM, DTNX Postmaster wrote:</span><br><span></span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>A single ANY query for a domain gives you the NS, MX, TXT and SPF records, plus any A/AAAA record present. At scale, who knows, the reduction in number of queries probably adds up.</span><br></blockquote><span></span><br><span>It strikes me as laziness and cost-shifting.</span><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#005001"><br></font></div></blockquote><br><div>If you need to do multiple queries (e.g. TXT & MX), is it better for either side to do two queries instead of one?</div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>TTFN,</div><div>patrick</div><div><br></div></body></html>