[dns-operations] 8.8.8.8 not supporting removing DS
Robert Martin-Legene
rlegene at gmail.com
Thu Nov 21 16:19:33 UTC 2024
Google's recursive DNS seems to dislike a registry operator removing DS for
some of their zones in parent zones, while still signing parent and child
properly. Even the now absence of DS is properly signed.
The response is SERVFAIL even though the TTL has long since expired in all
caches. Also, there is no DS in their cache when queried about DS.
All other known open recursive providers seem to adhere to the expected
behaviour.
Is this a bug, Google?
Feel free to contact me directly if you need specific zone names.
--
Robert Martin-Legene
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20241121/d9e2ff09/attachment.html>
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list